How Maximos works

Give Maximos the work. Keep the judgment.

Illustrative walkthrough of the loop Maximos runs: capture an opportunity, research it with sources, help diligence the open questions, keep your decision, and remember what followed. Scores are analytical aids.

All outputs are illustrative · Data does not represent real companies or real investment decisions

01Capture

An opportunity arrives. Maximos already has a place for it.

Forward an email, upload a deck, import a pipeline CSV, or message Maximos. Materials land on the company they belong to — with source and date attached — instead of disappearing into a thread.

Opportunity · Meridian Infrastructure

Series B — $45M

6 sources · 8 signals extracted

Illustrative

Source Materials

Management Deck

PDF · 28 slides

Uploaded Feb 15, 2026

ingested

Financial Model

Excel · 12 sheets

Uploaded Feb 18, 2026

ingested

Forwarded email

Inbox · intro + notes

Captured Mar 04, 2026

ingested

Pipeline CSV

CSV · 37 accounts

Uploaded Mar 10, 2026

ingested

Message Maximos

Note + follow-up

Captured Mar 12, 2026

ingested

Press excerpt

Attached article

Added Mar 18, 2026

ingested

Extracted Signals

ARR growth 68% YoY confirmed by management data

Pitch deck · 2026-02-15 · Confidence: medium

3 new enterprise logos added in Q1 2026

CRM export · 2026-03-10 · Confidence: high

AWS Marketplace partnership announced

Press release · 2026-03-05 · Confidence: high

Hiring velocity declined 18% QoQ

LinkedIn hiring data · 2026-03-20 · Confidence: high

Glassdoor rating dropped from 4.2 to 3.8

Glassdoor · 2026-03-18 · Confidence: medium

VP Sales role open 4+ months

LinkedIn · 2026-03-22 · Confidence: high

Competitor Vanta raised $150M Series C

TechCrunch · 2026-02-28 · Confidence: high

No updated financial data since January

Data freshness check · 2026-03-23 · Confidence: medium

Source, date, and channel stay with each item·Uploaded documents distinguished from live-crawled data

Capture → Research: materials become something you can ask against

02Research

Ask against the opportunity — and the firm’s own history.

Ask Maximos a question. Answers come from materials you have already given it, with sources attached, and from research Maximos can attach from public and firm context. Judgment stays yours.

Ask Maximos · Meridian Infrastructure

Source-linked answers on the live opportunity

Illustrative

What do we actually know about Meridian concentration?

Management reports top 3 accounts at 62% of ARR. That figure is claimed, not independently verified. Reference calls on those accounts are still open.

Management data · Diligence gap · Last meeting note

Have we seen this pattern before?

A prior pass on an adjacent compliance company is attached. The recorded reason was customer concentration plus an open sales-leadership seat — the same two issues on Meridian.

Firm decision log · Adjacent pass · 2025

What changed since the deck?

Hiring velocity declined 18% quarter-over-quarter. VP Sales has been open 4+ months. AWS Marketplace was announced after the deck was uploaded.

LinkedIn hiring data · Press release · Deck · Feb 15

Answers cite workspace materials and attached research · Analytical aid — not investment advice

Research → Diligence: open questions and contradictions stay visible

03Diligence

Everything the firm knows — risks, gaps, and the next question.

Maximos organizes evidence, contradictions, and open questions around the opportunity. Structured scoring is available when it helps. It does not replace the investor’s judgment.

Opportunity · March 2026

Meridian Infrastructure

Series B — $45M · Compliance Automation

72B+
Under Review
Deal owner: J. MortonReviewer: S. KapoorConfidence: MediumCONFIDENTIAL
AI-assisted assessment · Illustrative output · Human review required · Analytical aid — not investment advice

Company Overview

Meridian Infrastructure provides API-first compliance automation for regulated industries. The platform automates regulatory mapping, evidence collection, and audit preparation across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and FedRAMP frameworks. Founded in 2022 by a second-time founder with a prior exit to Cisco. Currently raising a $45M Series B at a $280M pre-money valuation.

Investment Thesis

1.Meridian has demonstrated strong product-market fit in mid-market financial services and healthcare verticals, evidenced by 115% net revenue retention and 68% ARR growth.

2.The founder's prior exit to Cisco and deep infrastructure expertise reduce execution risk relative to peers.

3.The API-first architecture creates meaningful switching costs and data network effects as customers integrate compliance workflows into CI/CD pipelines.

4.Regulatory complexity is a secular tailwind — compliance obligations compound annually, creating durable demand independent of economic cycles.

Thesis Signal Validation

“Meridian has demonstrated strong product-market fit in mid-market financial services and healthcare verticals, evidenced…”

+

ARR growth 68% YoY confirmed · Pitch deck

+

3 new enterprise logos Q1 2026 · CRM export

↑

VP Sales role open 4+ months · LinkedIn

“Regulatory complexity is a secular tailwind — compliance obligations compound annually, creating durable demand independ…”

+

AWS Marketplace partnership announced · Press release

↑

Competitor Vanta raised $150M Series C · TechCrunch

Key Strengths

Revenue growth

ARR $14.2M, growing 68% YoY. Revenue grew in each of the last 8 quarters.

Source: Management deck, p.12

Net revenue retention

NRR 115%, indicating strong expansion within existing accounts. Land-and-expand motion working.

Source: Management deck, p.18

Founder quality

CEO is a second-time founder — prior company (Canopy Networks) acquired by Cisco in 2019 for $180M. CTO previously led infrastructure at Stripe.

Source: LinkedIn, Crunchbase, press

Market timing

Regulatory burden increasing annually. SOC 2 audits now required by 78% of enterprise procurement teams (Coalfire survey).

Source: Industry research

Customer quality

37 enterprise customers including 2 Fortune 500 logos. Average contract value $384K.

Source: Management deck, p.22

Signal Conflicts — Requires Attention

▲Management claims 68% YoY ARR growth but hiring velocity is declining — inconsistent with sustained hypergrowth narrative.

▲NRR of 115% suggests strong product stickiness, but customer concentration at 62% in top 3 accounts introduces fragility not visible in aggregate NRR.

▲Management describes "efficient growth" while burn multiple is 2.1x — above the median for Series B infrastructure companies at this scale.

Key Risks

Customer concentration

Top 3 accounts represent 62% of ARR. Loss of any single account would materially impact growth trajectory.

Source: Management data

Burn multiple

Burn multiple 2.1x — elevated for a Series B company at this scale. Management cites go-to-market investment; needs monitoring.

Source: Financial model

No audited financials

All financial data is self-reported. No independent audit has been conducted. Standard at this stage but limits verification.

Source: Due diligence gap

Hiring deceleration

Hiring velocity declined 18% QoQ. VP Sales position open for 4+ months. Glassdoor rating declined from 4.2 to 3.8.

Source: LinkedIn, Glassdoor

Competitive pressure

Two well-funded competitors (Drata, Vanta) raised Series C rounds in the last 6 months. Market consolidation risk increasing.

Source: Crunchbase, press

Single-geography revenue

100% of revenue is US-based. International expansion not yet validated.

Source: Management deck

Open Diligence Questions

high

Customer reference validation

Request 3–5 customer reference calls to validate NRR claims and product stickiness. Prioritize customers in the top-3 concentration bracket.

high

Financial audit

Request management-prepared P&L and balance sheet for independent review. Verify ARR calculation methodology and contract terms.

medium

VP Sales pipeline

Understand why the VP Sales role has been open 4+ months. Assess whether sales leadership gap is impacting pipeline conversion.

medium

Competitive positioning

Request win/loss analysis against Drata and Vanta. Understand where Meridian wins and loses in competitive evaluations.

medium

Cohort economics

Request unit economics by customer cohort — LTV/CAC by vintage, payback period, and expansion trajectory by segment.

Recommended Next Steps

1.Schedule 3 customer reference calls — prioritize top-3 revenue accounts to assess concentration risk.

2.Request management-prepared P&L and 12-month financial model for independent review.

3.Conduct competitive analysis session with Meridian CEO — focus on positioning vs. Drata/Vanta.

4.Request cohort-level unit economics and expansion revenue breakdown.

Working stance — attached to the opportunity

Advance to deep diligence

Strong product-market fit indicators and founder quality justify continued evaluation. Customer concentration, burn multiple, and hiring deceleration represent material risks that must be validated through reference calls and financial review before proceeding to term sheet discussion.

J. Morton

2026-03-24

Conviction: 72%

8 signals evaluated·3 positive·5 negative·Structured analysis available when useful · Medium confidenceIllustrative output

When you want structured analysis

The Maximos Score is optional. Each dimension shows its evidence basis — verified, claimed, inferred, or missing. It is an aid, not the decision.

Structured analysis · Meridian Infrastructure

Series B — $45M · Compliance Automation

72/ B+-4
Confidence: mediumFreshness: 3 days agoMethodology: V2Computed: Mar 23, 2026

Why score declined

▼Hiring velocity declined 18% quarter-over-quarter

▼Customer concentration increased — top 3 accounts now 62% of ARR

▼No updated financial data received since January

Dimension Breakdown

verifiedclaimedinferredmissing
Financial Strengthclaimed18% wt · 81
+ ARR $14.2M growing 68% YoY+ 18-month runway at current burn− No audited financials provided
Team Qualityverified12% wt · 74
+ CEO — 2nd-time founder, prior exit to Cisco+ CTO — ex-Stripe, 12 years infrastructure− VP Sales role open for 4+ months
Traction Validationclaimed15% wt · 68
+ Net revenue retention 115%+ 37 enterprise customers− Limited public customer references
Market Positionverified10% wt · 77
+ Category growing 34% CAGR per Gartner+ No dominant incumbent below $500M ARR
Momentumverified10% wt · 61
+ 3 product releases in Q4+ Partnership with AWS Marketplace announced− Hiring velocity declined 18% QoQ
Competitive Moatinferred8% wt · 70
+ 3 granted patents in core technology+ Data network effects from 37 enterprise deployments− Two well-funded competitors raised Series C in last 6 months
Capital Efficiencyclaimed8% wt · 65
+ LTV/CAC ratio estimated at 4.2x− Burn multiple 2.1x — elevated for stage
Governanceinferred6% wt · 58
+ Clean cap table structure+ Standard Series B terms− No independent board representation
Risk Profileverified8% wt · 63
+ No pending litigation found in public records− Customer concentration — top 3 accounts 62% of ARR
Data Confidenceinferred5% wt · 54
+ 14 signals from 4 independent providers− Financial data self-reported, not independently verified
→

Evidence cap applied — 'claimed' basis limits score ceiling until independently verified

→

Score delta (-4 pts) driven by Momentum dimension — Glassdoor signal + LinkedIn hiring data, Mar 20

Missing Data — Reduces Confidence

Audited financial statementsCustomer reference callsUnit economics by cohortBoard composition and governance docsCap table detailCompetitive win/loss data
Optional structured analysis · V2 · 10 dimensions · analytical aidIllustrative

Diligence → Decide: the investor makes the call

04Decide

You make the call. Maximos keeps the why.

Advance, pass, or revisit later. The rationale, risks you acknowledged, and next action stay with the opportunity — so the firm can remember the decision without turning investing into a formula.

Decision · Meridian Infrastructure

Meridian Infrastructure · Series B

IC-2026-041

2026-03-24

Decision

Advance to deep diligence

Actor

J. Morton

Partner

Conviction

72/100

Rationale

Strong product-market fit indicators and founder quality justify continued evaluation. Customer concentration, burn multiple, and hiring deceleration represent material risks that must be validated through reference calls and financial review before proceeding to term sheet discussion.

Score snapshot

72 · B+ · V2 · Confidence: Medium

Locked at time of decision · Cannot be amended

Risks acknowledged at decision

!

Customer concentration

Top 3 accounts represent 62% of ARR. Loss of any single account would materially…

Next steps committed

1.

Schedule 3 customer reference calls — prioritize top-3 revenue accounts to assess concentration risk.

2.

Request management-prepared P&L and 12-month financial model for independent review.

3.

Conduct competitive analysis session with Meridian CEO — focus on positioning vs. Drata/Vanta.

Rationale and score snapshot stay with the decisionIllustrative

Decision Log · Institutional Memory

4 decisions logged · Chronological · Non-editable after creation

Illustrative

Advance to deep diligence

Meridian Infrastructure

J. Morton

2026-03-24

Strong PMF indicators and founder quality justify continued evaluation. Customer concentration and burn multiple are material risks requiring validation through references and financial review.

Score at decision: 72Conviction: 72%

Follow-up: Schedule 3 customer reference calls. Request management-prepared P&L.

Pass — return to monitoring

Arbor Logistics

S. Kapoor

2026-03-15

Unit economics do not support the requested valuation at current growth rate. Customer churn in Q4 exceeded acceptable threshold. Willing to re-engage if management addresses churn and demonstrates improved retention in Q2.

Score at decision: 48Conviction: 35%Outcome: Monitoring

Outcome Recorded

Score stable at 48. No material changes since pass decision. Re-evaluation threshold set at score >60 or management outreach.

2026-03-22

Advance to term sheet discussion

Canopy Health

J. Morton

2026-03-10

Exceptional traction in digital health — 140% NRR, zero gross churn in enterprise segment. Regulatory moat from HIPAA compliance platform creates meaningful barriers. Team quality is outstanding. Customer references uniformly strong.

Score at decision: 84Conviction: 85%

Follow-up: Draft preliminary term sheet. Schedule governance review with counsel.

Hold — pending risk assessment

Athos Capital Systems

J. Morton

2026-03-19

Customer concentration risk escalated following Q4 earnings disclosure. Deferring further commitment until management provides assessment of renewal confidence for largest account.

Score at decision: 65Conviction: 55%

Follow-up: Urgent: request management call on renewal risk by March 25.

Decision records are locked after creation · Score at decision is preserved for calibration

Decide → Follow through: the next action stays on the opportunity

05Follow through

Open work stays attached. Next actions do not disappear.

Reference calls, missing materials, and commitments stay on the opportunity with an owner. Firms that want formal review gates can use them. Maximos does not impose one process.

Open work · Meridian Infrastructure

Meridian Infrastructure · Series B

Illustrative

Diligence Checklist

✓

Market research completed

Gartner, IDC cross-referenced

✓

Team background verified

LinkedIn + press confirmed

✓

ARR growth reviewed

Management deck, p.12

!

Customer reference calls

3 of 5 scheduled — 2 pending

!

Competitive positioning

Win/loss data not provided

✕

Audited financial statements

Still open — can be completed or waived with a recorded reason

Still open

Reference calls + financialsOwner: J. Morton

Next: remaining reference calls on the top-3 accounts

Open Diligence Questions

high

Customer reference validation

Request 3–5 customer reference calls to validate NRR claims and product stickiness. Prioritize customers in the top-3 concentration bracket.

high

Financial audit

Request management-prepared P&L and balance sheet for independent review. Verify ARR calculation methodology and contract terms.

medium

VP Sales pipeline

Understand why the VP Sales role has been open 4+ months. Assess whether sales leadership gap is impacting pipeline conversion.

medium

Competitive positioning

Request win/loss analysis against Drata and Vanta. Understand where Meridian wins and loses in competitive evaluations.

medium

Cohort economics

Request unit economics by customer cohort — LTV/CAC by vintage, payback period, and expansion trajectory by segment.

low

Board composition

Confirm board structure and governance provisions. Independent board representation is absent — assess whether this is a concern at this stage.

Tasks stay on the opportunity·Open items can be completed, waived with a reason, or left visible

Follow through → Remember: later context attaches to what you decided

06Remember

Concept preview

What the firm learned stays with the firm.

Decisions, rationale, and later evidence attach to the original thesis. Teams can add new context today. Automated monitoring is shown as a Preview.

Thesis Drift Alert · Momentum Deterioration

Meridian Infrastructure

Illustrative

Original investment thesis

“Meridian has demonstrated strong product-market fit in mid-market financial services and healthcare verticals, evidenced by 115% net revenue retention and 68% ARR growth.”

Thesis logged

Apr 1, 2026 · J. Morton · Partner

Observed change

Hiring contraction and declining employer sentiment

·

LinkedIn job postings: 14 active roles (vs. 22 last quarter) — verified Mar 20

·

Glassdoor rating: 3.8 (was 4.2 in Q4 2025) — 6 new reviews in period

·

VP Sales posting first appeared Nov 2025 — still active

→ Preview

Score impact: Momentum 73 → 61 · Overall -4 pts·Recommended: Request management call to understand hiring strategy. Assess whether …

Hiring contraction and declining employer sentiment

Meridian Infrastructure · Momentum Deterioration

high

2026-03-20

Meridian's hiring velocity declined 18% quarter-over-quarter based on LinkedIn job postings analysis. Simultaneously, Glassdoor employer rating declined from 4.2 to 3.8 over the same period. VP Sales role has been open for 4+ months with no fill. Combined, these signals suggest operational stress or strategic pivot not yet communicated to investors.

Supporting Evidence

·LinkedIn job postings: 14 active roles (vs. 22 last quarter) — verified Mar 20

·Glassdoor rating: 3.8 (was 4.2 in Q4 2025) — 6 new reviews in period

·VP Sales posting first appeared Nov 2025 — still active

Missing Information

?Management commentary on hiring slowdown

?Updated org chart or headcount plan

?Pipeline coverage ratio with current sales team

Impact

Score dimension 'Momentum' declined from 73 to 61. Overall Maximos Score declined 4 points (76 → 72).

Recommended

Request management call to understand hiring strategy. Assess whether VP Sales gap is impacting pipeline conversion and Q2 forecast.

Confidence: highPrior state: Momentum was stable at 73 for 2 consecutive scoring cycles. This …

Largest customer announced vendor consolidation review

Athos Capital Systems · Concentration Risk

critical

2026-03-18

Athos Capital Systems' largest customer (representing 28% of ARR) announced an internal vendor consolidation initiative in their Q4 earnings call. The CFO referenced 'rationalizing software spend across compliance and risk tooling' — a category that includes Athos' core offering. No direct mention of Athos, but the initiative represents material renewal risk for the FY2027 contract.

Supporting Evidence

·Q4 2025 earnings call transcript — CFO remarks on vendor consolidation (p. 14)

·Customer represents $3.2M of Athos' $11.4M ARR (28%)

·Contract renewal date: September 2026 (6 months away)

Missing Information

?Direct communication from customer procurement team

?Athos management assessment of renewal confidence

?Competitive positioning within customer's consolidation framework

Impact

If this contract is lost or materially reduced, Athos' growth rate would decline from 45% to approximately 12% YoY. Risk Profile score would deteriorate significantly.

Recommended

Flag to deal owner immediately. Request urgent management call with Athos CEO to assess renewal confidence and customer relationship health.

Confidence: mediumPrior state: Customer relationship was rated 'stable' based on last quarterly …

Financial reporting 60+ days overdue — confidence declining

Veridian Analytics · Data Staleness

medium

2026-03-22

Veridian Analytics has not provided updated financial reporting since January 15, 2026. The company committed to monthly reporting as a condition of the monitoring agreement. The gap now exceeds 60 days. Data Confidence score has been automatically penalized. Other signal providers (LinkedIn, press) continue to report normally.

Supporting Evidence

·Last financial data received: January 15, 2026

·Reporting cadence commitment: monthly (per side letter)

·Non-financial signals (hiring, press) remain active and current

Missing Information

?February and March financial updates

?Management explanation for reporting delay

?Updated cash position and runway estimate

Impact

Data Confidence dimension declined from 72 to 48. Overall score reduced by 2 points due to freshness penalty. Financial-dependent dimensions (Financial Strength, Capital Efficiency) now reflect increased uncertainty.

Recommended

Send formal reporting reminder to Veridian CFO. Assess whether reporting delay indicates operational distress or administrative oversight.

Confidence: highPrior state: Veridian had provided timely monthly reports for 8 consecutive mo…

Command Center · Operating View

What requires attention

6 items4 high priority
●

Largest customer announced vendor consolidation review

critical

28% of ARR at risk — customer CFO referenced compliance tooling rationalization in Q4 earnings. Contract renews Sep 2026.

Athos Capital SystemsRisk AlertMar 22
Request urgent management call
△

Maximos Score declined 76 → 72

high

Driven by hiring contraction (−18% QoQ), declining Glassdoor rating (4.2→3.8), and data staleness. Momentum dimension declined 12 points.

Meridian InfrastructureScore ChangeMar 20
Review score drivers
◌

Financial reporting 60+ days overdue

medium

Monthly reporting commitment not met since January. Data Confidence score penalized. Non-financial signals remain current.

Veridian AnalyticsStale DataMar 22
Send reporting reminder
◷

IC review — materials not complete

high

Partner review scheduled for Mar 28. Customer references pending (2 of 3 completed). Financial model review outstanding.

Canopy HealthDecision DueMar 24 · due Mar 28
Complete diligence checklist
◆

AWS Marketplace partnership announced

medium

Meridian listed on AWS Marketplace with co-sell arrangement. Potential distribution channel expansion for enterprise segment.

Meridian InfrastructureNew SignalMar 05
Assess channel impact
!

Customer reference calls — overdue

high

3 reference calls assigned to A. Chen on Mar 15. No update recorded. Blocking diligence completion.

Arbor LogisticsTask OverdueAssigned Mar 15
Reassign or escalate
Illustrative operating viewPreview

Underneath the work

Evidence and controls when the firm needs them.

Provenance, versioned methodology, and a locked decision record are Maximos capabilities — not the reason to start. They sit under the daily work.

Evidence Provenance

Every claim traces to its source.

Each extracted signal carries its source, acquisition date, basis classification (verified, claimed, inferred, or missing), and the score contribution it produced. Nothing enters the model without attribution.

Methodology Versioning

Scores are versioned and human-auditable.

The Maximos Score uses a named methodology version (V2). When the methodology changes, existing scores are not retroactively altered. Each score record logs the methodology version used at computation time.

Governed Human Review

No automated pass-through to IC.

Review requirements do not auto-advance. Open items can be completed, waived with a recorded reason, or left visible. Review status is tracked and attributed. Authorized humans retain final authority.

Audit Trail

Every decision is logged and locked.

Every IC decision logs the actor, date, conviction level, rationale, score at time of decision, and risks acknowledged. The score snapshot is locked at decision time and preserved for calibration and LP reporting.

See Maximos on a live opportunity.

Bring one live opportunity. Capture, research, and diligence surfaces above reflect current product capabilities. Automated monitoring is labeled as a preview.